29 May 2016 13:09:24
1) Bos-Sac-LAL

Bos: D Cousins
Sac: Olynyk+ #2 (Ingram)
LAL: #3 (Dunn) + 1rnd pick Nets 17 and 18

2) LAL-Philly
LAL: Noel+ 1rnd pick LA 2017
Philly: D Russell


Boston:
The 3rd pick is useless for Boston. The two best players available are Dunn and Bender.
They already have IT and Smart, so they don't need Dunn and Bender is going to be good, but he's a prospect and need af few years. So receiving Cousins is worth giving up the Nets picks. Boston is in a win now fase.

Sac:
D Cousins is propably the best center in the NBA, but he can't bring the Kings into the playoffs. Olynyk is a descent repalcement and they can rebuilt around WCS and Ingram, a potential star.

Pilladelphia:
Philly has too many biggs. Noel is a restricted free agent next year, so they need to trade him this year or pay him big money next year. Simmons and Russell could give good Chemistry to that team. so giving up the LA pick is worth receiving Russell

LA
The Lakers are not going to sign KD or LBJ and other players aren't going to make them contenders. so they should tank and rebuilt.
Giving up Ingram is a gamble, because he can become a star. But Dunn is going to be a good pointguard and the 2017 draft is going to be deep, so receiving those picks give them a future. Drafting Dunn, makes Russell tradable. So trading him for Noel (or Okafor) and returning the 17 pick is an upgrade. So LA should only resign Clarckson and keep their capspace.

1.) 29 May 2016
29 May 2016 14:57:35
This would never happen in a million years

2.) 30 May 2016
30 May 2016 00:02:08
Under LA you wrote 'so they should tank and rebuild'. What do you think we have been doing the last couple of years?

3.) 30 May 2016
30 May 2016 06:10:34
Horrible trade for lakers, #2 for #3 and not even get cousins